Tags: mba
This is the way that works. If you are naturally inquisitive and self disciplined you do not need formal education. If you are not self-motivated then an education helps. The biggest difference in the method of education is time. Most formal education requires tasks to be completed in a limited period of time. The next advantage of formal education is the synergy developed when students engage in debate and discussion in organized fashion.
I always believed most of the critical decisions are made based on emotion, gut feel, common-sense. I guess one needs more than an MBA for effective decision making or becoming a successful entrepreneur.
I always believed most of the critical decisions are made based on emotion, gut feel, common-sense. I guess one needs more than an MBA for effective decision making or becoming a successful entrepreneur.
Two richest men in U.S. : Bill Gates - No MBA; Warren Buffet Columbia MBA. So - It varies.
There are a lot of very successful MBA's, and some not so successful. However, there are many counter examples because they started earlier and practiced longer. Basically, it seems it takes about 10,000 hours of experience to get good at something and have a chance to be world class. This data from studies on what it takes succeed in general.
So people like Larry Ellison at Oracle, Bill Gates, and Steve Jobs started in high school, dropped out of college, and did great in business. Also, they were helped by huge market upswing in computer technology driven by engineering breakthroughs at Intel, etc. which they turned into consumer or corporate products.
However, many entrepreneurs had/have MBA's - they start later in life, and it may take them longer - so they may not be as the super rich but they have more likelihood of success.
So if you are talking on a percentage basis of success basis, then the MBA's win.
Of the non-MBA's who start - and don't fail -which is a small percentage - then some of them become the super rich who surpass most MBA's.
Getty said - Rise Early, Work Hard, Strike Oil.
In terms of non-entrepreneurial positions, almost all Fortune 500 CEO's have MBA's. And many of the most successful have MBA's and are great at running their businesses. For example, Best CEO in Banking: Jamie Dimon, CEO, MBA, JP Morgan Chase. Failure to run bank: Charles Prince, Lawyer, former CEO of Citibank.
Many MBA's are better at running established businesses. They learn in class, they learn from case studies, books, early jobs where they to run a small part of the business, friends from school, working with others, etc. Most MBA schools require 3 or more years business experience plus outstanding intelligence. Then they put all those people together for 2 years in classes with case studies, debates, projects, etc. So the education definitely helps.
The answer Ernesto is NO. An education can however give a person the confidence to try something, and it will give him a better chance of being hired to help in someone else's business. Most businesses are copies of companies already operating, but each person runs a business differently, so the whole idea of copying something is not that easy.
In the Franchise business, we spend a lot of time profiling the applicant, because it takes a different kind of person to be happy running a Franchise. I bring up Franchising because it has a greater percentage of successes. In start up small businesses only ten percent survive beyond 5 years. In Franchises 90% survive. A Franchisee has to have a lot of the entrepreneurial qualities - but he still has to follow someone else's rules. There are more entrepreneurs than there are successful entrepreneurs.
Personal attributes, many of which can be learned, are definitely essential for success, but knowing all the answers and not being able to apply them is a recipe for failure.
© 2010 Created by Jack Sandler Bloom.